Comparing 2025 Seasons of Red Sox 2B, 3B Options – Update

Three weeks ago I posted charts comparing the 2025 seasons of players that, at least in the press, were being considered as options for the Red Sox to play at second base and/or third base in 2025. Most of these players not currently being part of the organization. Much has changed these past 3 weeks, and so an update was called for. Below find the updated chart with new players added, some utility players removed, and a couple of extra stats added to make the picture a bit more complete. I’ve kept Alex Bregman, Bo Bichette, and Ketel Marte on the list even though they are no longer options, just to serve as reference points. I’ve also highlighted names of players currently on the Red Sox in red.

As before, the order was chosen based on number of plate appearances in 2025. Most on the left, least on the right.

Note in the top section I added a WAR per 600 plate appearances line. This WAR is the average of the Baseball Reference WAR, the FanGraphs WAR, and Baseball Prospectus’ WARP. I then scale it to what it would have been had the player accumulated WAR at the same rate through the season, and had 600 plate appearances. This makes it more like a rate stat, and I feel it makes for a better comparison for players with varying amounts of playing time.

I also added a line in the Running section for Baserunning Run Value per 600 plate appearances. This starts with the Statcast Baserunning Run Value numbers, which combines the run value of extra bases attempted and the run values of stolen base attempts. I then scale to 600 plate appearances so that players with less playing time don’t get shoved to the middle of the pack. Trevor Story, Nico Hoerner, and Jeremy Pena all excelled here, and they’re all fast runners. Seven players were duds at baserunning; six of those are slow runners; the other one, Romy Gonzalez, is actually a fast runner. He needs to work on his baserunning game.

Despite that, I honestly think that Romy Gonzalez is the best overall infielder the Red Sox have right now. I would have expected to tell you it was Trevor Story, but I am surprised how poorly his numbers show here. He did have a big early-season slump with the bat, so maybe I should assume better 2026 numbers at the plate for him. The biggest surprise was defense – not a lot of errors, but very poor metrics for runs prevented. Perhaps he was less daring after all the injuries over the previous 3 years. Absolutely great on the basepaths, which was nice.

Romy, though poor on the basepaths, and average on defense, blossomed at the plate to produce the second best results on the team there, behind only Roman Anthony. It was the payoff for some intense offseason work with a good hitting coach. What really stands out is the elite hard-hit rate (5th best in the MLB, behind Anthony, Schwarber, Judge, Ohtani). This was tempered by a very low launch angle and very high ground ball rate. There is potential here for a breakout season in 2026.

Marcelo Mayer similarly had a very good hard-hit rate tempered by a low launch angle (well Roman Anthony did, too, actually), but in terms of overall results at the plate, besides a good rate of doubles (Fenway can do that for you), in every other way his results at the plate were poor. Good-not-great defense, okay baserunning. Right now I consider him “unproven” as a major leaguer. Most fans seem to assume he’ll be a regular and Romy Gonzalez should be the bench/utility guy, but I want to see more from Mayer before I’d consider him “regular starter” material.

So what about the possible imports? Jeremy Pena is a name I heard mentioned – he definitely tops the list in terms of overall value. I don’t know how realistic it would be to acquire him, but he looks like a real solid 5-tool guy in his prime. He’d knock Trevor Story out of the shortstop position.

Nico Hoerner, a second baseman, is the top defender on this list, just outstanding, and one of the best baserunners, too. He puts the ball in play and gets a lot of singles, but has no power. The least of anyone on this list.

Brett Baty, who plays 2B and 3B, is perhaps the most balanced of the rest, good at everything, great at nothing. Average bat and baserunning, above average defense.

Eugenio Suarez is perhaps the most imbalanced of the rest. He does one thing well: mash home runs. But he does that exceptionally well. Worst at singles, okay at doubles, lots of strikeouts. Poor baserunner, very poor fielder. Yet still valuable for the home runs. How will his bat play in Fenway, though?

Isaac Paredes has a strong bat; lots of home runs, good numbers for walks and strikeouts, though his low expected wOBA says he may have been lucky in 2025. And his bat is tempered by poor baserunning and poor defense at 3B.

Brendan Donovan, a second baseman, has a very good overall bat that lacks power. Good/okay baserunning, substandard fielding.

Alec Bohm, a third baseman, is similar. Average or slightly above average bat with no power. Poor baserunning, okay fielding.

Matt Shaw is young – was just 23 last year, a rookie. He’s fast, and provided excellent third base defense. His bat didn’t live up to expectations, but that happens in rookie years. He showed some power, was average with strikeouts and walks, but a low batting average, slug, and OBP. His value comes in whatever faith there is that his bat will develop. He could become very good.

The last one on the list is Mark Vientos. I’m not sure why he’s considered an option. Oh, I see, he had one good season in 2024. But going by 2025, he’s got some pop to his bat, but brings nothing else to the table. Low OBP, low overall bat value, slow, poor defense at third base. He doesn’t bring an improvement over any of the existing Story-Mayer-Gonzalez trio. There’s no point in acquiring this guy.

In the end, here would be my reaction to the Red Sox acquiring one of these guys:

Jeremy Pena: Enthusiastic yes.

Nico Hoerner: Good with this.

Matt Shaw: Probably good with this.

Baty, Suarez: Maybe good with these.

Paredes, Donovan, Bohm, Vientos: No thank you.

Here are the same stats for hitting and running presented in terms of standard deviations from the mean.

Comparing the 2025 seasons of Red Sox options for 2B and 3B

A lot of names have been mentioned as possible second basemen or third basemen for the Boston Red Sox in 2026. Some are already on the roster (Marcelo Mayer); some could be added by trade (Ketel Marte, Brendan Donovan); some could be picked up as free agents (Bo Bichette, Alex Bregman).

There are other names on the current Red Sox roster that have played significant time at second and/or third base, but are not mentioned in articles about who will get regular playing time in the Red Sox infield. And I have issues with this. Specifically, I have issues every time I read that Marcelo Mayer is presumed to be the player who will round out the infield after they acquire a second or third baseman. Because when I look at what Romy Gonzalez did in 2025, I see a guy who is no longer a platoon player, he’s a guy that deserves to play every day. In addition to that, his elite hard-hit rate makes him a breakout candidate, and I’m saying that despite the fact that he was already the second-best hitter on the Red Sox in 2025. His defense is not bad, it’s good enough, and his baserunning is a plus. He’s proven at the major league level, in ways that Marcelo Mayer isn’t. He can be relied on to produce good results in ways that Marcelo Mayer can’t yet.

The thing that will allow him to break out? If he just stops hitting the ball into the ground so much. Of all the guys I’m comparing in this article, he does that the most. His average launch angle is the lowest. The result is that he’s one of the best in baseball at hitting doubles and triples, but his rate of home runs is a little below average.

He could also stand to chase less, and correspondingly increase his walk rate while decreasing his strikeout rate.

If you care about home runs, stikeouts, and walks, any of the 5 potential acquisitions (Bichette, Marte, Donovan, Bregman, Paredes) will be an improvement over Romy Gonzalez. But if you care about overall results at the plate, only Ketel Marte is looking like an improvement over Gonzalez. And when you factor in fielding and baserunning, there are some even bigger advantages for Gonzalez over most of these 5.

I’d hoped to discuss more specifics about comparisons of individual players, but I am finding it hard to find time to write this article. So I’ll just show you the tables I created to make these comparisons easy.

Here are the comparisons I’ve created for these players. The players are ordered left to right by most plate appearances in 2025.

Red means the number is above MLB average; blue means it’s below MLB average. White is MLB average. I set the deepest red to 2.8 standard deviations better than the mean (usually above, but sometimes below), and the deepest blue to 2.8 standard deviations worse than the mean. For hitting and baserunning, a table showing the numerical values of these standard deviations follows.

These same statistics expressed as standard deviations better (red) or worse (blue) than MLB average is below. In some cases, the data was more log-normal than normal, so I used standard deviations of the logarithm of the stat. These are labeled as such.

Here are the numbers supporting my previously mentioned statement that Romy Gonzalez can unlock a lot more power if he learns to elevate the ball. He hits it into the ground too much.

Why this Red Sox fan hated the Willson Contreras / Hunter Dobbins trade

I hated the trade of Willson Contreras to my team, the Boston Red Sox, for RHP Hunter Dobbins, RHP Yhoiker Fajardo and RHP Blake Aita. The Red Sox got a good player who doesn’t improve the team, while giving a player who was a personal favorite.

Hunter Dobbins was my favorite pitcher on the Sox, not for how he pitched, but for the things he said. For the competitive fire. For the anti-Yankees fervor. He seemed promising as a #5 starter.

When I say that Willson Contreras doesn’t improve the Red Sox, that hinges on something that I get the feeling that nobody agrees with me on: that Romy Gonzalez has evolved into one of the top bats on the team, whose elite hard-hit rate could turn him into one of the top bats in the game if he could learn to elevate the ball a bit (he hits it into the ground too much). If you go by multi-year track record, people are right about Gonzalez and Contreras; but if you go just by 2025, as I do in my comments to follow, they’ve got Romy all wrong.

I’ve stated elsewhere, when you analyze it carefully, you see that Contreras is no better than Romy Gonzalez at first base. He’s a good player that the Red Sox didn’t need.

A key part of that statement is “at first base”. Romy’s best position defensively has always been first base, where he rates as average by all the different rating systems (he’s a below average fielder everywhere else). Contreras is effectively the same as Romy at 1B in Total Zone, Defensive Runs Saved, and Deserved Runs prevented. Only Statcast’s Fielding Run Value has him significantly higher, where he is a substantially above-average 4.

At the plate? They’re very similar in wOBA, Expected wOBA, and OBP. Contreras gets more walks and home runs, but not a ton more. Romy gets more singles, doubles, triples, and strikes out slightly less. They both chase too much.

Playing in Fenway, Contreras will probably see his doubles numbers catch up to Romy’s, but their home run numbers may get closer too. But Romy is just a slight adjustment away from unlocking a ton more power, as I mentioned above, with his elite hard-hit rate, but tendency to hit the ball into the ground.

Baserunning? Romy is clearly the better one here.

Positional versatility? Slight advantage to Contreras because it’s great to have an emergency backup catcher, but Romy is strong in this category too.

I figured, put Romy at first until Casas is ready, then work things out from there. Get one other infielder, preferably a third baseman, or a Ketel Marte. That would have been best. Anthony, Gonzalez, and Casas could all be giving the Red Sox power in spades if they can all be healthy.

Now instead, Romy plays second base where he’s worse defensively (I hope he gets better), and Casas is kind of blocked. Contreras may be a power hitter, but the Red Sox may not end up with any more power production for his acquisition.

Would Pete Alonso improve Red Sox first base situation all that much?

Pete Alonso is one of the best bats in baseball, no question about that. But to get his bat at first base, you have to take with it his awful fielding and awful baserunning. That waters down his value to some extent. But by how much? And how does he compare to players currently on the Red Sox, and other available options?

I’ll present the data here and some other observations, so that you can compare. I’ll finish by talking about whether it makes sense for the Red Sox to add a player or stick with who they have. All the data shown here is from BaseballSavant.

The players to be compared

I picked the 3 first base free agents who were considered the best on the market when this offseason began, and put their stats on the top row of the comparisons below. (I started putting these together weeks ago when Josh Naylor was still a free agent.) On the bottom row I put a top first base trade possibility in Yandy Diaz, and the two top major league first base options on the Red Sox currently, Romy Gonzalez and Triston Casas.

For 5 of the players, I show their 2025 numbers. For Triston Casas, who didn’t play enough in 2024 and 2025 to give us a good idea of what he is, I show his 2023 numbers.

Expected stats

Let’s start with the expected stats. This is where they look at the velocity, launch angle and trajectory of every ball a player put in play, and tally up the probable results based on those numbers.

Focusing primarily on xwOBA, we see that all six players did well, although when you look at the actual values instead of the percentiles, Alonso is clearly separated from the pack, with only Triston Casas giving him a challenge there.

Quality of contact

Now we’ll look at quality of contact.

Alonso had the best overall contact, however Romy Gonzalez had more hard-hit balls. In fact he had the 5th highest Hard Hit% in baseball for players with over 300 PA. (Who was ahead of him? 1. Roman Anthony 2. Kyle Schwarber 3. Shohei Ohtani 4. Aaron Judge.) Yandy Diaz also hit it hard frequently.

But neither Gonzalez nor Diaz get an ideal launch angle (“LA Sweet Spot %”) as much as Alonso does. For both of them it turns out it’s because they hit too many ground balls – Diaz especially. This is likely the reason Diaz’s results aren’t as good as Alonso’s, and for Gonzalez, one of two reasons (we’ll see the other in the next section).

While O’Hearn and Naylor are limited by lower bat speed, O’Hearn improves his results by often having a good launch angle, and Naylor gets a better exit velocity by hitting on the sweet spot of the bat a lot.

Triston Casas’ 2023 comes the closest to Alonso’s 2025 among those pictured here. The differences may only be due to looking at a rookie season versus a veteran in his prime having his best season yet.

Non-contact stats

So that’s what happens when they swing and make contact. What about the numbers when they don’t make contact? Who chases pitches out of the zone too much (Chase %)? Who misses a lot when he swings (Whiff %)? Who walks too little or strikes out too much?

Alonso and O’Hearn are average in these categories. Yandy Diaz is above average, and Romy Gonzalez is well below average. Triston Casas has a great eye, but still manages to swing and miss at an above average pace. Josh Naylor doesn’t chase and doesn’t strike out, but walks an average amount.

Here we have what looks like the other reason Romy Gonzalez doesn’t get better results despite hitting the ball so hard. He chases too much. And while fixing that doesn’t necessarily fix his higher strikeout rate and low walk rate, it ought to at least help.

Fielding and Baserunning

What’s left? Fielding and baserunning.

Here again we see strong similarity between Triston Casas and Pete Alonso. They’re both terribly slow, and awful at both fielding and baserunning. But being slow isn’t the excuse for the rest, because look at Josh Naylor, who is even slower, but manages to be an average baserunner and a decent fielder.

When it comes to baserunning, Romy Gonzalez is the opposite of Josh Naylor. He’s the only one in this group that could be called “fast”, yet he’s still a poor baserunner. Maybe he should get a pointer or two from his teammate Trevor Story, who runs just as fast as Gonzalez but was one of the top baserunners in the game last year. Or maybe we should give him a little credit for being an average or above average baserunner in the past.

As for good fielders, it looks like Ryan O’Hearn is the only one, with Naylor and Gonzalez a little below average. But Gonzalez split his time between first and second base (and some other spots), and when you break his fielding down by position, both in his career and in 2025, he’s been an above-average fielding first baseman, and a below-average fielder everywhere else.

Categorizing these players

So to sum up, I see two basic types of player here.

Pete Alonso and Triston Casas are the power hitters who can get on base, too, but are awful at fielding and baserunning. Yandy Diaz is, too, but with a little less power and a little better baserunning.

In the other category are Josh Naylor and Ryan O’Hearn, who have some power, but not a lot, but still manage to have above-average impact as hitters. And at everything else, they’re average, on the whole.

The 2025 version of Romy Gonzalez belongs in the O’Hearn/Naylor camp, as a well-rounded player with an above-average bat. But he has the raw tools to become much better. He’s got enough speed to become a great baserunner. He’s one of the best in the game at hitting the ball hard, but he hits it on the ground too much, and he misses it too much. And here’s the thing: the parts of his game that are lacking and that are holding him back, are all things he can learn to be better at. He can learn to be a smarter baserunner. He can learn plate discipline. He can learn to hit the ball just a little lower than he does now, to get it into the air more.

The question is, will he?

If he does, he creates a new category, combining the best of O’Hearn/Naylor with the best of Alonso/Casas, and he’d be better than all of them.

Who’s on first?

So what should the Red Sox do? If they can get Pete Alonso in to play first base for them, should they?

Alonso would certainly help the lineup. But if Triston Casas has a healthy year, he’s basically a Pete Alonso clone for much less money.

What if Casas is injured again, though? He sure seems injury prone. Then your backup plan is Romy Gonzalez, who is as good as your second-or-third best first base free agents that were on the market at the start of this offseason. And with the right coaching and effort, could end up being better than all of them in the short term.

So regardless of whether Casas can or can’t play, the Red Sox will have a plus option at first base. They don’t need Alonso to play first base for them.

But Alonso would improve them at DH. But to make that room, they’d need to trade/drop Masataka Yoshida, to whom they owe $36M over the next two years, and probably one of their 4 top-notch outfielders. Not to say they won’t; they may. But they may not.

In the end, Alonso may not add as much value as people think he will, when compared to what the Red Sox would get from the current players who he would replace. All that may not be worth the expected $150M price tag.

My Red Sox posts on OverTheMonster

It’s become very hard to find a particular author’s FanPosts on OverTheMonster. So I’ve made this page so that I can find mine.

But before we get to mine, have a look at this post by another FanPoster that aged really well:

Mar 28, 2018 How the Red Sox will Achieve World Domination in 2018

posted over 7 years ago by Ricochet!

Here are links to every FanPost I made from 2017 through 2019. I hope to add the earlier ones in soon.

Date Article
Jul 28, 2019 This Fangraphs writer clearly doesn’t get how deep the Red Sox lineup is
Jun 22, 2019 Is JBJ about to turn into a pumpkin?
May 31, 2019 OPS contest thirdway checkin
Apr 6, 2019 We can throw away the first 10 Red Sox games
Mar 30, 2019 It’s not just that the Red Sox starters are still in spring training
Mar 15, 2019 Contest: Who will be the most improved Red Sox hitters this year?
Nov 2, 2018 Poll: which free agents should the Red Sox bring back?
Sep 14, 2018 Last night the Red Sox clinched home field advantage in the World Series
Aug 20, 2018 Are the Red Sox becoming victims of their own success?
Jul 24, 2018 The Red Sox do not need another reliever
Jul 6, 2018 Red Sox first half surprises and busts (OPS contest results)
Jul 5, 2018 A 10-day opportunity to build a lead over the Yankees
Apr 20, 2018 Absurd projections and feasible dreams after one ninth of a season
Apr 3, 2018 A quick look at how the first trip through the rotation went
Mar 24, 2018 Contest – predict the Red Sox’ first half OPS’s
Dec 27, 2017 Which Mitch? What an injury-free Moreland might produce in 2018
Oct 23, 2017 Get Big Papi into the Red Sox dugout as a coach
Oct 3, 2017 Fanpost Friday playoff predictions of tomisphere
Sep 15, 2017 The Red Sox could play 9 games in a row against the Houston Astros
Jul 28, 2017 Final-stretch thoughts on Rusney, Dustin, Mookie, Brock, Eduardo, Deven, Rafael, and everybody
Jul 14, 2017 Poll: How do we feel now about the Red Sox catchers?
Jul 4, 2017 Deven Marrero just had a fantastic week at the plate
Jul 3, 2017 Contest results: predict Red Sox first half OPS’s
Jun 15, 2017 Poll: Is it time to advance Devers & Chavis?
Jun 8, 2017 How I became a fan of the Boston Red Sox
May 24, 2017 Poll: Will the next Red Sox call up be … Ryan Court?
May 13, 2017 Cap extra innings at three, then declare a tie
May 8, 2017 Judging Surprising Aarons
May 1, 2017 Fix the Red Sox offense – mostly, by waiting
Apr 18, 2017 The coming year will determine whether to trade Leon or Swihart
Apr 4, 2017 2017 Red Sox Season in Review: What a Year It Was
Mar 26, 2017 Contest: predict Red Sox first half OPS’s
Mar 20, 2017 FF Favorite: Javier Baez, For Love of the Game
Mar 15, 2017 Poll: Who will be the Red Sox main catcher after the All-Star break?
Mar 4, 2017 What you think of the World Baseball Classic depends a lot on who you are
Feb 25, 2017 My rule change would hopefully reduce the chance of injury
   

Garrett Crochet pitched the best start of the year but didn’t get the win. We can fix that.

The merit method of awarding wins fixes all the injustices that the current method of awarding wins punishes starting pitchers with. The latest of these injustices happened to Garrett Crochet, ace of the Boston Red Sox, last night. He threw 8 scoreless, 3-hit innings before giving up a game-tying solo home run to baseball’s best hitter, Aaron Judge, with one out in the top of the ninth. With only one run of support from his teammates, that tie score made Crochet ineligible to earn a win, as he was removed from the game at that point, and the current rules say the win goes to the pitcher who was the active pitcher when the winning team took its final lead. So the win went to Garrett Whitlock, who retired the two batters he faced in the top of the 10th inning. Whitlock performed well. But who did more to earn the win? The guy who faced 2 batters over 1 inning of work, giving up no runs, or the guy who faced 30 batters over 8 and 1/3 innings, giving up 1 run to a top offense and the Red Sox’ arch rivals?

If you agree with me that Crochet did more to earn that win, then you’ll like the merit method for awarding wins.. I explain the method in my post The how and the why of awarding wins to pitchers by the merit method.

Using that method, we take the 2 runs that the Red Sox scored in Friday’s game and divide by 9 and 2/3, which is the number of innings the Red Sox were at bat. This gives us the average number of runs the Red Sox scored in each inning, the fraction 6/29. Then we simply credit each Red Sox pitcher with this number of runs for every inning they pitched. And then we subtract from this the number of runs they gave up. This gives each pitcher a number of “Runs Ahead”. Then we give the win to the pitcher with the greatest number of Runs Ahead.

The cool thing about this method is that adding the Runs Ahead of all the winning team’s pitchers always gives you a positive number, and adding all the Runs Ahead of the losing team’s pitchers always gives you a negative number. This method also assigns the losing pitcher as the one with the most negative Runs Ahead value.

Here’s a table showing the numbers discussed above for the Red Sox pitchers in last night’s game. In the first three columns in the table below we see IP, RCr/IP, and RCr, which stand for Innings Pitched, Runs Credited per inning pitched, and Runs Credited, respectively. You get the third column (Runs Credited) by multiplying together the first two.

PitcherIPRCr/IPRCrRRA
Garrett Crochet8 ⅓6/2950/29121/29
Aroldis Chapman6/294/2904/29
Garrett Whitlock16/296/2906/29
Runs Ahead (RA) calculations for Red Sox pitchers in victory over New York Yankees, June 13, 2025

Then you subtract runs allowed (R) from this to get each pitcher’s number of Runs Ahead (RA) for that game. Because Garrett Crochet had the highest number of Runs Ahead for the winning team, he would be awarded the win by the merit method. But by current rules, the win went to the other Garrett (Whitlock).

I hope someday to convince MLB league officials to change to the merit method for awarding wins. It fixes so many things that are just not right about the current method.

The worst Red Sox article from Wednesday, Feb 25

Yesterday’s Hall of Shame baseball article was by Daniel Fox of the Sporting News.

It includes this lie:
“the Red Sox’s overflow of left-handed hitters and the eventual need to move Devers down the defensive spectrum has led the team to shop their first baseman.”

What a doozy. Let’s break this down.

No shopping

The Red Sox have not shopped Triston Casas. That’s a myth that got started early after the 2024 season with a Ken Rosenthal speculated trade possibility. It was not based on any information about what the Red Sox were actually doing; it was just a guess at something they might try to do. But it got reported a lot. Then other prognosticators gave their dreamt-up trade scenarios involving Casas. And those got re-reported. Before long, a “where there’s smoke, there’s fire” mentality that developed among reporters, who started saying that they must be shopping Casas, given all this buzz about it.
But the Red Sox stated that no such thing was happening. They had to tell Casas that they had no idea where all these rumors were coming from, and that they intended to keep him.
At one point we did learn that Seattle had asked for Casas as part of a return for a pitcher that the Red Sox wanted, but the Red Sox essentially shut that down by saying Masataka Yoshida would have to be part of any trade involving Casas. That’s it. That’s not shopping Casas, but for some reporters it was enough to convince them.

    So the latter part of Daniel Fox’s sentence is a lie.

    No moving Devers

    There is no plan to move Devers to first base. Most people think that if Devers is moved, he would actually move to DH. There’s no reason to think he would be an improvement defensively over Casas at first, so this idea makes little sense.

    Also, Devers has clearly been promised by the team that he can stay a third baseman. He is highly opposed to playing anywhere else. They’ll likely need to keep him where he is.

    No overflow of lefties

    There is no overflow of left-handed hitters. The roster the Red Sox are most likely to open the season with would have more right-handed hitters than left-handed ones. For much of last year that was not true, because their two injured right-handed-hitting middle infielders (Story, Grissom) were replaced by left-handed hitters (Hamilton, Valdez). This helped cement their reputation as being to left-handed. But after Story and Grissom returned, all it took was one added right-handed bat to make them more right-handed than left. That happened when they signed Alex Bregman.

      But the real issue isn’t the number of right-handed hitters, it’s the number of players who hit left-handed pitching well. And when it comes to that, it turns out that Triston Casas has been the second-best on the current team at hitting lefties over the past two years, behind only Rob Refsnyder. And the best among regular starters. The idea of making the team better against lefties by removing Casas is absurd. A much better way would be to remove Masataka Yoshida or Wilyer Abreu.

      Daniel Fox managed to pack a lot of wrong ideas into that sentence quoted above. It’s bad enough to add to the Hall of Shame.